2020 Tire Market Overview Braking Test

Performance Metrics

Dry Braking
Wet Braking

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Position: 1st

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 32.1 M 0 (0%)
Wet Braking 29.8 M 0 (0%)

Nokian PowerProof Position: 2nd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 32.9 M +0.8 (2.49%)
Wet Braking 29.1 M -0.7 (-2.35%)

Bridgestone Potenza S001 Position: 3rd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 33.5 M +1.4 (4.36%)
Wet Braking 28.7 M -1.1 (-3.69%)

Continental Premium Contact 6 Position: 4th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 33.2 M +1.1 (3.43%)
Wet Braking 30.2 M +0.4 (1.34%)

Kumho Ecsta PS71 Position: 5th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.9 M +2.8 (8.72%)
Wet Braking 29 M -0.8 (-2.68%)

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Position: 6th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 33.2 M +1.1 (3.43%)
Wet Braking 30.8 M +1 (3.36%)

Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Position: 7th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 33.2 M +1.1 (3.43%)
Wet Braking 30.9 M +1.1 (3.69%)

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Position: 8th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 33.4 M +1.3 (4.05%)
Wet Braking 31.3 M +1.5 (5.03%)

Apollo Aspire XP Position: 9th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.7 M +2.6 (8.1%)
Wet Braking 30.3 M +0.5 (1.68%)

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 Position: 10th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.7 M +2.6 (8.1%)
Wet Braking 30.3 M +0.5 (1.68%)

Firestone RoadHawk Position: 11th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.3 M +2.2 (6.85%)
Wet Braking 30.8 M +1 (3.36%)

Fulda SportControl 2 Position: 12th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.2 M +2.1 (6.54%)
Wet Braking 31.7 M +1.9 (6.38%)

Kleber Dynaxer UHP Position: 13th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.1 M +2 (6.23%)
Wet Braking 32.2 M +2.4 (8.05%)

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ Position: 14th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34 M +1.9 (5.92%)
Wet Braking 32.6 M +2.8 (9.4%)

Falken Azenis FK510 Position: 15th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36 M +3.9 (12.15%)
Wet Braking 30.7 M +0.9 (3.02%)

Toyo Proxes Sport Position: 16th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.4 M +3.3 (10.28%)
Wet Braking 31.5 M +1.7 (5.7%)

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 Position: 17th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.3 M +2.2 (6.85%)
Wet Braking 33 M +3.2 (10.74%)

Zeetex HP2000 vfm Position: 18th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36 M +3.9 (12.15%)
Wet Braking 31.8 M +2 (6.71%)

Uniroyal RainSport 3 Position: 19th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.7 M +3.6 (11.21%)
Wet Braking 32.4 M +2.6 (8.72%)

Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Position: 20th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.8 M +2.7 (8.41%)
Wet Braking 33.4 M +3.6 (12.08%)

Infinity Ecomax Position: 21st

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.7 M +3.6 (11.21%)
Wet Braking 32.6 M +2.8 (9.4%)

Giti GitiSport S1 Position: 22nd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.5 M +3.4 (10.59%)
Wet Braking 32.9 M +3.1 (10.4%)

Semperit SpeedLife 2 Position: 23rd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.2 M +4.1 (12.77%)
Wet Braking 32.2 M +2.4 (8.05%)

Debica Presto UHP2 Position: 24th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.1 M +4 (12.46%)
Wet Braking 32.8 M +3 (10.07%)

Pirelli P Zero Position: 25th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.8 M +2.7 (8.41%)
Wet Braking 34.6 M +4.8 (16.11%)

Yokohama Advan Sport V105 Position: 26th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.3 M +3.2 (9.97%)
Wet Braking 34.7 M +4.9 (16.44%)

Mabor Sport Jet 3 Position: 27th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.9 M +3.8 (11.84%)
Wet Braking 34.3 M +4.5 (15.1%)

Sava Intensa UHP 2 Position: 28th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 34.7 M +2.6 (8.1%)
Wet Braking 35.5 M +5.7 (19.13%)

Cooper Zeon Sport Position: 29th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36 M +3.9 (12.15%)
Wet Braking 34.5 M +4.7 (15.77%)

Avon ZZS Position: 30th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.2 M +4.1 (12.77%)
Wet Braking 35.2 M +5.4 (18.12%)

Gislaved Ultra Speed Position: 31st

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37.5 M +5.4 (16.82%)
Wet Braking 33.9 M +4.1 (13.76%)

Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3 Position: 33rd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36 M +3.9 (12.15%)
Wet Braking 35.7 M +5.9 (19.8%)

General Altimax One S Position: 34th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.4 M +3.3 (10.28%)
Wet Braking 35.4 M +5.6 (18.79%)

Radar Dimax R8 Position: 35th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.7 M +4.6 (14.33%)
Wet Braking 36.7 M +6.9 (23.15%)

Viking ProTech HP Position: 36th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37.3 M +5.2 (16.2%)
Wet Braking 34.8 M +5 (16.78%)

Tracmax X Privilo TX3 Position: 37th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37 M +4.9 (15.26%)
Wet Braking 35.4 M +5.6 (18.79%)

Minerva Radial F 205 Position: 38th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.9 M +4.8 (14.95%)
Wet Braking 36 M +6.2 (20.81%)

Rotalla RU01 S Pace Position: 39th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37.2 M +5.1 (15.89%)
Wet Braking 35.7 M +5.9 (19.8%)

Tristar Sportpower 2 Position: 40th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.5 M +4.4 (13.71%)
Wet Braking 37 M +7.2 (24.16%)

Dayton Touring 2 Position: 41st

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.4 M +4.3 (13.4%)
Wet Braking 37.2 M +7.4 (24.83%)

Barum Bravuris 5HM Position: 42nd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37.7 M +5.6 (17.45%)
Wet Braking 36.1 M +6.3 (21.14%)

Marshal MU12 Position: 43rd

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.6 M +4.5 (14.02%)
Wet Braking 37.4 M +7.6 (25.5%)

Seiberling Seiberling Touring 2 Position: 44th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37 M +4.9 (15.26%)
Wet Braking 37 M +7.2 (24.16%)

Federal Evoluzion ST 1 Position: 45th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 35.3 M +3.2 (9.97%)
Wet Braking 39.4 M +9.6 (32.21%)

Nankang NS2 Position: 46th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.5 M +4.4 (13.71%)
Wet Braking 38.2 M +8.4 (28.19%)

GT Radial SportActive Position: 47th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 36.8 M +4.7 (14.64%)
Wet Braking 39.1 M +9.3 (31.21%)

Imperial Ecosport 2 Position: 48th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37.3 M +5.2 (16.2%)
Wet Braking 38.7 M +8.9 (29.87%)

Accelera PHI R Position: 49th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 37.4 M +5.3 (16.51%)
Wet Braking 40.5 M +10.7 (35.91%)

King Meiler Sport 3 KM Position: 50th

Performance Metrics

LabelValueDifference to Test Winner
Dry Braking 41 M +8.9 (27.73%)
Wet Braking 43.2 M +13.4 (44.97%)