2019 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test

Performance Metrics

Dry Handling

Dry Braking

Wet Handling

Wet Braking

Subjective Ratings

Subj. Dry Handling

Subj. Wet Handling

Subj. Comfort

Extra Metrics

Rolling Resistance

Noise

Special Conditions

Straight Aqua

Value Metrics

Tire Weight

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport Position: 1st

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	60.6 s	0 (0%)
Dry Braking	35.8 M	0 (0%)
Wet Handling	70.37 s	0 (0%)
Wet Braking	48.6 M	0 (0%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	8.7 Points	0 (0%)
Subj. Wet Handling	9 Points	0 (0%)
Subj. Comfort	7 Points	0 (0%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	9.04 kg / t	0 (0%)
Noise	73.8 dB	0 (0%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	84.7 Km/H	0 (0%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	43.5 Kg	0 (0%)

Michelin Pilot Sport 4S Position: 2nd

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	60.5 s	-0.1 (-0.17%)
Dry Braking	35 M	-0.8 (-2.23%)
Wet Handling	73.4 s	+3.03 (4.31%)
Wet Braking	46.3 M	-2.3 (-4.73%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	8.3 Points	-0.4 (-4.6%)
Subj. Wet Handling	6.5 Points	-2.5 (-27.78%)
Subj. Comfort	8.5 Points	+1.5 (21.43%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	8.7 kg / t	-0.34 (-3.76%)
Noise	72.4 dB	-1.4 (-1.9%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	86.7 Km/H	+2 (2.36%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	45.2 Kg	+1.7 (3.91%)

Continental SportContact 6 Position: 3rd

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	60.3 s	-0.3 (-0.5%)
Dry Braking	35.4 M	-0.4 (-1.12%)
Wet Handling	73.36 s	+2.99 (4.25%)
Wet Braking	46.9 M	-1.7 (-3.5%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	9 Points	+0.3 (3.45%)
Subj. Wet Handling	6 Points	-3 (-33.33%)
Subj. Comfort	8 Points	+1 (14.29%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	8.18 kg / t	-0.86 (-9.51%)
Noise	72.1 dB	-1.7 (-2.3%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	85.8 Km/H	+1.1 (1.3%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	44.1 Kg	+0.6 (1.38%)

Falken Azenis FK510 Position: 4th

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	61.1 s	+0.5 (0.83%)
Dry Braking	37.4 M	+1.6 (4.47%)
Wet Handling	73.54 s	+3.17 (4.5%)
Wet Braking	48.4 M	-0.2 (-0.41%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	6.6 Points	-2.1 (-24.14%)
Subj. Wet Handling	7 Points	-2 (-22.22%)
Subj. Comfort	9.8 Points	+2.8 (40%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	9.1 kg / t	+0.06 (0.66%)
Noise	72.9 dB	-0.9 (-1.22%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	85.9 Km/H	+1.2 (1.42%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	47.8 Kg	+4.3 (9.89%)

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Position: 5th

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	60.9 s	+0.3 (0.5%)
Dry Braking	37.7 M	+1.9 (5.31%)
Wet Handling	72.78 s	+2.41 (3.42%)
Wet Braking	53.8 M	+5.2 (10.7%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	8.9 Points	+0.2 (2.3%)
Subj. Wet Handling	8 Points	-1 (-11.11%)
Subj. Comfort	6.5 Points	-0.5 (-7.14%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	9.31 kg / t	+0.27 (2.99%)
Noise	73.4 dB	-0.4 (-0.54%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	83.8 Km/H	-0.9 (-1.06%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	51.3 Kg	+7.8 (17.93%)

Toyo Proxes Sport Position: 6th

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	62.2 s	+1.6 (2.64%)
Dry Braking	38.8 M	+3 (8.38%)
Wet Handling	73.17 s	+2.8 (3.98%)
Wet Braking	49.9 M	+1.3 (2.67%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	7.6 Points	-1.1 (-12.64%)
Subj. Wet Handling	7 Points	-2 (-22.22%)
Subj. Comfort	8 Points	+1 (14.29%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	8.91 kg / t	-0.13 (-1.44%)
Noise	73.3 dB	-0.5 (-0.68%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	86.9 Km/H	+2.2 (2.6%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	45.3 Kg	+1.8 (4.14%)

Kumho Ecsta PS91 Position: 7th

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	61.2 s	+0.6 (0.99%)
Dry Braking	37.7 M	+1.9 (5.31%)
Wet Handling	74.83 s	+4.46 (6.34%)
Wet Braking	56.8 M	+8.2 (16.87%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	7.5 Points	-1.2 (-13.79%)
Subj. Wet Handling	6 Points	-3 (-33.33%)
Subj. Comfort	7 Points	0 (0%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	9.41 kg / t	+0.37 (4.09%)
Noise	72.5 dB	-1.3 (-1.76%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	83.6 Km/H	-1.1 (-1.3%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	50.1 Kg	+6.6 (15.17%)

Accelera PHI Position: 8th

Performance Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Dry Handling	63.8 s	+3.2 (5.28%)
Dry Braking	40.5 M	+4.7 (13.13%)
Wet Handling	86.43 s	+16.06 (22.82%)
Wet Braking	73.3 M	+24.7 (50.82%)

Subjective Ratings

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Subj. Dry Handling	5.6 Points	-3.1 (-35.63%)
Subj. Wet Handling	2 Points	-7 (-77.78%)
Subj. Comfort	8 Points	+1 (14.29%)

Extra Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Rolling Resistance	8.31 kg / t	-0.73 (-8.08%)
Noise	72.3 dB	-1.5 (-2.03%)

Special Conditions

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Straight Aqua	82.9 Km/H	-1.8 (-2.13%)

Value Metrics

Label	Value	Difference to Test Winner
Tire Weight	47.9 Kg	+4.4 (10.11%)