2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test
Performance Metrics
Dry Handling
Dry Braking
Wet Handling
Wet Braking
Subjective Ratings
Subj. Comfort
Extra Metrics
Rolling Resistance
Noise
Wear
Special Conditions
Straight Aqua
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 Position: 1st
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 117.7 Km/H | 0 (0%) |
| Dry Braking | 34.2 M | 0 (0%) |
| Wet Handling | 76.5 Km/H | 0 (0%) |
| Wet Braking | 29.6 M | 0 (0%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 9 Points | 0 (0%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.8 kg / t | 0 (0%) |
| Noise | 71.6 dB | 0 (0%) |
| Wear | 51090 Km | 0 (0%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 99.7 Km/H | 0 (0%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.4 Price/1000 | 0 (0%) |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Position: 2nd
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.8 Km/H | -0.9 (-0.76%) |
| Dry Braking | 34.7 M | +0.5 (1.46%) |
| Wet Handling | 74.7 Km/H | -1.8 (-2.35%) |
| Wet Braking | 28.8 M | -0.8 (-2.7%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 6 Points | -3 (-33.33%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.61 kg / t | -0.19 (-1.94%) |
| Noise | 72.6 dB | +1 (1.4%) |
| Wear | 54210 Km | +3120 (6.11%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 95 Km/H | -4.7 (-4.71%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.59 Price/1000 | +0.19 (2.02%) |
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 117.4 Km/H | -0.3 (-0.25%) |
| Dry Braking | 36 M | +1.8 (5.26%) |
| Wet Handling | 74.4 Km/H | -2.1 (-2.75%) |
| Wet Braking | 29 M | -0.6 (-2.03%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.48 kg / t | -0.32 (-3.27%) |
| Noise | 71.7 dB | +0.1 (0.14%) |
| Wear | 39390 Km | -11700 (-22.9%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 95.6 Km/H | -4.1 (-4.11%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 8.76 Price/1000 | -0.64 (-6.81%) |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 Position: 3rd
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 117.5 Km/H | -0.2 (-0.17%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.2 M | +1 (2.92%) |
| Wet Handling | 73.2 Km/H | -3.3 (-4.31%) |
| Wet Braking | 28.7 M | -0.9 (-3.04%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 6 Points | -3 (-33.33%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.48 kg / t | -0.32 (-3.27%) |
| Noise | 71.8 dB | +0.2 (0.28%) |
| Wear | 41340 Km | -9750 (-19.08%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 95.1 Km/H | -4.6 (-4.61%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.19 Price/1000 | -0.21 (-2.23%) |
Continental Premium Contact 6 Position: 5th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.4 Km/H | -1.3 (-1.1%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.8 M | +1.6 (4.68%) |
| Wet Handling | 73.3 Km/H | -3.2 (-4.18%) |
| Wet Braking | 29.9 M | +0.3 (1.01%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 8.23 kg / t | -1.57 (-16.02%) |
| Noise | 72.6 dB | +1 (1.4%) |
| Wear | 50700 Km | -390 (-0.76%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 91.8 Km/H | -7.9 (-7.92%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 8.09 Price/1000 | -1.31 (-13.94%) |
Fulda SportControl 2 Position: 6th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.9 Km/H | -0.8 (-0.68%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.1 M | +0.9 (2.63%) |
| Wet Handling | 73 Km/H | -3.5 (-4.58%) |
| Wet Braking | 32 M | +2.4 (8.11%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 6 Points | -3 (-33.33%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.09 kg / t | -0.71 (-7.24%) |
| Noise | 71.9 dB | +0.3 (0.42%) |
| Wear | 38220 Km | -12870 (-25.19%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 93.8 Km/H | -5.9 (-5.92%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 8.77 Price/1000 | -0.63 (-6.7%) |
Nokian WetProof Position: 7th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.3 Km/H | -1.4 (-1.19%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.2 M | +1 (2.92%) |
| Wet Handling | 75.9 Km/H | -0.6 (-0.78%) |
| Wet Braking | 29.7 M | +0.1 (0.34%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 5 Points | -4 (-44.44%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.49 kg / t | -0.31 (-3.16%) |
| Noise | 71.3 dB | -0.3 (-0.42%) |
| Wear | 37440 Km | -13650 (-26.72%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 90.8 Km/H | -8.9 (-8.93%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 10.28 Price/1000 | +0.88 (9.36%) |
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 118 Km/H | +0.3 (0.25%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.1 M | +0.9 (2.63%) |
| Wet Handling | 75.7 Km/H | -0.8 (-1.05%) |
| Wet Braking | 28.9 M | -0.7 (-2.36%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 6 Points | -3 (-33.33%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 10.27 kg / t | +0.47 (4.8%) |
| Noise | 73.5 dB | +1.9 (2.65%) |
| Wear | 35880 Km | -15210 (-29.77%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 92.3 Km/H | -7.4 (-7.42%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 12.26 Price/1000 | +2.86 (30.43%) |
Sava Intensa UHP 2 Position: 9th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.8 Km/H | -0.9 (-0.76%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.7 M | +1.5 (4.39%) |
| Wet Handling | 72.8 Km/H | -3.7 (-4.84%) |
| Wet Braking | 32.8 M | +3.2 (10.81%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 8 Points | -1 (-11.11%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.22 kg / t | -0.58 (-5.92%) |
| Noise | 72.6 dB | +1 (1.4%) |
| Wear | 44850 Km | -6240 (-12.21%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 94.9 Km/H | -4.8 (-4.81%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 6.47 Price/1000 | -2.93 (-31.17%) |
Apollo Aspire XP Position: 10th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 115.7 Km/H | -2 (-1.7%) |
| Dry Braking | 36.3 M | +2.1 (6.14%) |
| Wet Handling | 73.8 Km/H | -2.7 (-3.53%) |
| Wet Braking | 31 M | +1.4 (4.73%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 8.97 kg / t | -0.83 (-8.47%) |
| Noise | 71.5 dB | -0.1 (-0.14%) |
| Wear | 40560 Km | -10530 (-20.61%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 94.6 Km/H | -5.1 (-5.12%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 8.38 Price/1000 | -1.02 (-10.85%) |
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Position: 10th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 117.1 Km/H | -0.6 (-0.51%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.3 M | +1.1 (3.22%) |
| Wet Handling | 72.9 Km/H | -3.6 (-4.71%) |
| Wet Braking | 30.8 M | +1.2 (4.05%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 5 Points | -4 (-44.44%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 11.49 kg / t | +1.69 (17.24%) |
| Noise | 72.3 dB | +0.7 (0.98%) |
| Wear | 38610 Km | -12480 (-24.43%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 94 Km/H | -5.7 (-5.72%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.32 Price/1000 | -0.08 (-0.85%) |
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Position: 10th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 115.6 Km/H | -2.1 (-1.78%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.6 M | +1.4 (4.09%) |
| Wet Handling | 74.9 Km/H | -1.6 (-2.09%) |
| Wet Braking | 30.9 M | +1.3 (4.39%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 7.49 kg / t | -2.31 (-23.57%) |
| Noise | 75 dB | +3.4 (4.75%) |
| Wear | 41370 Km | -9720 (-19.03%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 91.7 Km/H | -8 (-8.02%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.59 Price/1000 | +0.19 (2.02%) |
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 Position: 13th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 117 Km/H | -0.7 (-0.59%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.4 M | +1.2 (3.51%) |
| Wet Handling | 72.1 Km/H | -4.4 (-5.75%) |
| Wet Braking | 31.4 M | +1.8 (6.08%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 2 Points | -7 (-77.78%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.43 kg / t | -0.37 (-3.78%) |
| Noise | 72.2 dB | +0.6 (0.84%) |
| Wear | 41730 Km | -9360 (-18.32%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 96.1 Km/H | -3.6 (-3.61%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.11 Price/1000 | -0.29 (-3.09%) |
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.2 Km/H | -1.5 (-1.27%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.2 M | +1 (2.92%) |
| Wet Handling | 72.3 Km/H | -4.2 (-5.49%) |
| Wet Braking | 32.9 M | +3.3 (11.15%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 5 Points | -4 (-44.44%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 9.08 kg / t | -0.72 (-7.35%) |
| Noise | 71.4 dB | -0.2 (-0.28%) |
| Wear | 35880 Km | -15210 (-29.77%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 92.2 Km/H | -7.5 (-7.52%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 11.43 Price/1000 | +2.03 (21.6%) |
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.3 Km/H | -1.4 (-1.19%) |
| Dry Braking | 37.1 M | +2.9 (8.48%) |
| Wet Handling | 74 Km/H | -2.5 (-3.27%) |
| Wet Braking | 31.7 M | +2.1 (7.09%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 10.67 kg / t | +0.87 (8.88%) |
| Noise | 72.7 dB | +1.1 (1.54%) |
| Wear | 30420 Km | -20670 (-40.46%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 96.8 Km/H | -2.9 (-2.91%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 11.83 Price/1000 | +2.43 (25.85%) |
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Position: 16th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 115.6 Km/H | -2.1 (-1.78%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.9 M | +1.7 (4.97%) |
| Wet Handling | 71.6 Km/H | -4.9 (-6.41%) |
| Wet Braking | 32.1 M | +2.5 (8.45%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 8.99 kg / t | -0.81 (-8.27%) |
| Noise | 71.8 dB | +0.2 (0.28%) |
| Wear | 39050 Km | -12040 (-23.57%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 91.1 Km/H | -8.6 (-8.63%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.48 Price/1000 | +0.08 (0.85%) |
Maxxis Premitra HP5 Position: 17th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116 Km/H | -1.7 (-1.44%) |
| Dry Braking | 36.3 M | +2.1 (6.14%) |
| Wet Handling | 72.2 Km/H | -4.3 (-5.62%) |
| Wet Braking | 33.2 M | +3.6 (12.16%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 8.47 kg / t | -1.33 (-13.57%) |
| Noise | 73 dB | +1.4 (1.96%) |
| Wear | 35490 Km | -15600 (-30.53%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 94.5 Km/H | -5.2 (-5.22%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 8.45 Price/1000 | -0.95 (-10.11%) |
Firestone RoadHawk Position: 18th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 115.3 Km/H | -2.4 (-2.04%) |
| Dry Braking | 35.2 M | +1 (2.92%) |
| Wet Handling | 72 Km/H | -4.5 (-5.88%) |
| Wet Braking | 32 M | +2.4 (8.11%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 5 Points | -4 (-44.44%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 7.69 kg / t | -2.11 (-21.53%) |
| Noise | 73 dB | +1.4 (1.96%) |
| Wear | 35490 Km | -15600 (-30.53%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 90.7 Km/H | -9 (-9.03%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 9.72 Price/1000 | +0.32 (3.4%) |
Kenda Emera A1 Position: 19th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 115.8 Km/H | -1.9 (-1.61%) |
| Dry Braking | 34.9 M | +0.7 (2.05%) |
| Wet Handling | 74.5 Km/H | -2 (-2.61%) |
| Wet Braking | 30.3 M | +0.7 (2.36%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 5 Points | -4 (-44.44%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 10.29 kg / t | +0.49 (5%) |
| Noise | 72.2 dB | +0.6 (0.84%) |
| Wear | 28080 Km | -23010 (-45.04%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 95.7 Km/H | -4 (-4.01%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 11.04 Price/1000 | +1.64 (17.45%) |
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Position: 20th
Performance Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Dry Handling | 116.3 Km/H | -1.4 (-1.19%) |
| Dry Braking | 37.1 M | +2.9 (8.48%) |
| Wet Handling | 73.2 Km/H | -3.3 (-4.31%) |
| Wet Braking | 31.6 M | +2 (6.76%) |
Subjective Ratings
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Subj. Comfort | 7 Points | -2 (-22.22%) |
Extra Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Rolling Resistance | 11.06 kg / t | +1.26 (12.86%) |
| Noise | 74.1 dB | +2.5 (3.49%) |
| Wear | 26520 Km | -24570 (-48.09%) |
Special Conditions
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Straight Aqua | 95.5 Km/H | -4.2 (-4.21%) |
Value Metrics
| Label | Value | Difference to Test Winner |
|---|
| Value | 12.07 Price/1000 | +2.67 (28.4%) |
